I've previously written elsewhere about the sustainability of the cruise industry. Overall, the industry is not known for being particularly eco-friendly, though many cruise lines have recently been making efforts to implement measures to make their ships less polluting and more energy efficient. Though significant advancements have been made, there's still a long way to go.
In an article on the Mother Nature Network, Shea Gunther recently wrote:
I agree with Gunther that as long as people want to travel on big cruise ships, it's great that some cruise companies are making efforts to become more sustainable. It seems as though the large size of the Oasis of the Seas has allowed Royal Caribbean to implement some new green measures.The Oasis of the Seas is far from green, but it does make some strides in the greener direction. The ship's huge liquefied natural gas fueled engines come equipped with pollution scrubbers that completely eliminate all SOx emissions, cut NOx emissions by 80 percent and CO2 by more than 20 percent. Manufacturer Wärtsilä claims Oasis of the Seas will use 25 percent less power than smaller but similar cruise ships. The ship will also process its own waste on board, reusing the wastewater and dumping nothing into the ocean. It's the first cruise ship to have a large tropical park filled with thousands of plants and natural features.
Short of a total societal breakdown or a severe and long lasting global economic depression, cruise ships aren't going anywhere anytime soon. If they're going to be sailing the seas, they should be as green as they can get, so kudos to Royal Caribbean for pushing the envelope in the right direction.
There remains, of course, the question of whether bigger is actually better in other ways. While some observers have noted that larger ships mean more tourist dollars for ports of call, the reality of 5,400 passengers spewing from a single ship could be overwhelming for many smaller ports. For residents, that may not be such fun after all.
For the traveler, a larger ship may offer more on-board options, but being joined by 5,399 fellow passengers is bound to negatively affect the chances of unique local experiences on land. Then again, travelers seeking a deep connection with a destination and authentic interactions with the local culture aren't particularly likely to be on this ship in the first place.
In the end, I'm sure this behemoth will appeal to many travelers for whom a cruise vacation is as much - or more - about the on-board experience as it is about the ports of call. But sorry, Royal Caribbean, I'm afraid it's just not for me.
-----
Addendum: I personally prefer small cruise ships (no more than 100 passengers, preferably smaller) and find even the standard big ships (2,000 passengers or so) much too big for my taste. For a discussion of large-ship versus small ship cruising, see my article on the subject at Seattle International Travel Examiner.
0 comments:
Post a Comment